Well, I thought that each of the drafts were improved in some particular way - at least in understanding the paper. For the first few lines of the first draft, he seems to be confident and professional about his writing style. He continues this throughout most of the piece and uses mature terms such as satirization, which to me presents the idea that he really knows what he discussing. However, it seems to be, in my opinion, that he does not make the greatest transitions between his paragraphs. He jumps from topic to topic to drastically for my personal taste. For the second draft, I appreciated how he immediately improved the draft by adding a subtitle. He pretty much stayed with the same introduction. However, I really enjoyed how he added a detailed paragraph about was "Brazil was meant to be infused with most of a comedic undertone than the book". It seems that he did additional research which evidently allows him to be more credible as a writer, and for the reader to believe his claim more. The funny thing about the last draft is how drastic the opening paragraph has been altered. He introduces his third draft: "Comic books such." This obviously grabs the readers attention more often than the generic ways writers open passages - it certainly worked for me. It gave me a chuckle and gave me the impression that it was going to be an amusing passage. Throughout the last third draft, he used the most mature vocabulary and had the most details and research. Therefore, it truly made the paper the greatest. I really enjoyed reading all of these drafts. The progression was greatly appreciated. For the most part, he kept the basic idea and structure of the paper. However, he added more details to each paragraph. I thought that it was extremely effective.